Review Surface — CLIPFORGE

RENDERS — 3

Artifacts for this claim come from docs/state, preserved from the handoff session. Re-render to produce fresh ones.

brutal · brag-flagship-recon·feed·9x16DRAFT WATERMARK BURNED IN

CONTACT SHEET — THE REVIEW SURFACE

DER SCROLL-STOPP-TEST

91/ 100SHIP

THRESHOLD 85/100 · SET BY REVIEW.MD

Hook & thumbnail truth23/25

Craft & polish25/20

Motion quality13/15

Brand compliance15/15

Narrative clarity, muted15/10

DEFECTS BY LOOP — DISPLAY ONLY

LOOP 184

[F0] cold open started near-black — the exact defect flagged on the July v3 cut; poster-first doctrine wins over the slam: NO. + sub + underline now composed from frame 0, slam converted to an on-beat flash + 6% pulse at beat 2 (composition.html scene 1)
[F828] blank final sheet tile — 829 captured frames vs -shortest audio truncation to 828; sheet list now derives from the actual MP4 frame count (render.ts)

LOOP 291

No defects.

Muted arc lands: NO. -> struck tool-graveyard -> lime-invert payoff -> qualitative proof rows -> Get the engineer. Not the tool. -> BRUTAL resolve. Zero client names, zero numerals — governance-clean by construction where v3 was not. With sound the 126bpm bed, slam hits and resolving stinger are a genuine upgrade layer; muted it loses nothing. Honest gaps to the July v3's texture: no RGB-split glitch frames on the NO. (v3 had them; the encode's rgbashift is milder) — worth an engine pass if Antonio wants the harsher look.

client_permissionTRUE

antonio_approvedPENDING

OPEN APPROVAL